- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:49, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- IC 1682 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The galaxy has only been featured in a small number of databases and large scale surveys which don't provide significant commentary on the object, thus fails WP:NASTCRIT. The claim that It has been extensively researched by NASA isn't supported by the citation given, which is a database maintained by NASA, and is WP:OR/personal opinion of the Wikipedia user. C messier (talk) 14:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. ‹hamster717🐉› (discuss anything!🐹✈️ • my contribs🌌🌠) 15:20, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Parejkoj (talk) 19:02, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: not notable. Praemonitus (talk) 13:38, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.